The location of your writing table determines how prolific you will be.
Tony Perez's Workshop in Creative Writing, Creative Drawing, and Creative Drama
|
|
Writing from The Heart
Design and execution by Meeko Marasigan
Writing from The Heart
"Writing from The Heart" is a workshop on creative writing, creative drawing, and creative drama.
There are three available versions of this workshop: one for beginners on the secondary, tertiary, and graduate levels, and another for practitioners.
A third version of this workshop is designed as an outreach program to disadvantaged and underserved audiences such as the disabled, the poor and the marginalized, victims of human trafficking, battered women and abused children, drug rehabilitation center residents, child combatants, children in conflict with the law, prisoners, and gang leaders. This third version incorporates creativity and problem awareness, conflict resolution, crisis intervention, trauma therapy, and peacemaking.
CURRENT ENTRIES:
Monday, April 1, 2019
Sunday, March 10, 2019
Wednesday, March 6, 2019
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _The Promise_ by Ivan
Hello Ivan, and congratulations! Your play has developed from a mere sketch on two sheets of paper into a full-blown play.
If you still have your first draft, read it, then read your present version again. The reason you succeeded is that you began writing without guilt, which is the essence of writing from a state of emotional truth.
A few comments:
1) Only one scene is underwritten, and that is Scene 3. Introduce dramatic action in this scene to push the premise forward.
2) Proofread your work. A few examples of your oversight:
--Page 1, Line 8: Change "can be played by the same actor" to "can be played by the actor who plays Andy".
--Page 1, Line 9: Change "can be played by the same actor that plays Penny" to "can be played by the actor who plays Penny".
I have to advise you, however, that using the same actors in multiple roles destroys the audience's suspension of disbelief. It brings the work from being dramatic to being theatrical, and might not work with this particular play.
--Page 6, Line 2: Change "worst for wear" to "the worse for wear".
--Page 7, Line 9: Change "breath" to "breathe".
--Page 9, Line 7: Change "Creepy" to "Creep".
There are more, but I won't bother to list them here. Proofread also for punctuation marks.
Remember that, as a painting must be clean, well-executed, and framed, so must a script be presentable to an artistic director and a producer.
3) Resolve the issue of your flashbacks, which will entail costume and make-up changes. These will look good on a TV screen on a bar, especially since your play can be held in an actual restaurant. The here and now of the play is the here and now of the audience. Don't stage flashbacks that will only remind them of where they really are and that they are just having dinner and watching a play. It's like being served unexpected appetizers before dessert.
4) Relabel Scene 17 as Scene 15A.
On the whole, this is a well-written play. As I mentioned previously, it will be most effective in an actual restaurant where the audience is being served dinner and with actual waiters milling about.
Your writing has become less uptight and definitey more relaxed, most probably as a result of your honesty toward your subject matter. It was a pleasure to read this play, and, I am certain, it will be an even greater pleasure to watch it. I hope that TheatreWorks will be willing to produce this in an actual restaurant, or in a set-up restaurant on the second floor of the theatre buiding, or in a cocktail party held in the same venue.
You may rewrite Scene 3 and polish this play and submit it to me again, if you wish, or you may do that and submit it to TheatreWorks for a possible staged reading or production.
If you still have your first draft, read it, then read your present version again. The reason you succeeded is that you began writing without guilt, which is the essence of writing from a state of emotional truth.
A few comments:
1) Only one scene is underwritten, and that is Scene 3. Introduce dramatic action in this scene to push the premise forward.
2) Proofread your work. A few examples of your oversight:
--Page 1, Line 8: Change "can be played by the same actor" to "can be played by the actor who plays Andy".
--Page 1, Line 9: Change "can be played by the same actor that plays Penny" to "can be played by the actor who plays Penny".
I have to advise you, however, that using the same actors in multiple roles destroys the audience's suspension of disbelief. It brings the work from being dramatic to being theatrical, and might not work with this particular play.
--Page 6, Line 2: Change "worst for wear" to "the worse for wear".
--Page 7, Line 9: Change "breath" to "breathe".
--Page 9, Line 7: Change "Creepy" to "Creep".
There are more, but I won't bother to list them here. Proofread also for punctuation marks.
Remember that, as a painting must be clean, well-executed, and framed, so must a script be presentable to an artistic director and a producer.
3) Resolve the issue of your flashbacks, which will entail costume and make-up changes. These will look good on a TV screen on a bar, especially since your play can be held in an actual restaurant. The here and now of the play is the here and now of the audience. Don't stage flashbacks that will only remind them of where they really are and that they are just having dinner and watching a play. It's like being served unexpected appetizers before dessert.
4) Relabel Scene 17 as Scene 15A.
On the whole, this is a well-written play. As I mentioned previously, it will be most effective in an actual restaurant where the audience is being served dinner and with actual waiters milling about.
Your writing has become less uptight and definitey more relaxed, most probably as a result of your honesty toward your subject matter. It was a pleasure to read this play, and, I am certain, it will be an even greater pleasure to watch it. I hope that TheatreWorks will be willing to produce this in an actual restaurant, or in a set-up restaurant on the second floor of the theatre buiding, or in a cocktail party held in the same venue.
You may rewrite Scene 3 and polish this play and submit it to me again, if you wish, or you may do that and submit it to TheatreWorks for a possible staged reading or production.
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
Thursday, January 24, 2019
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _The Burning_/_My Children Are Virgins_ by Helmi
Hello Helmi!
Just a few comments--otherwise your play is ready for a staged reading or, hopefully, a full production. It is dark yet funny and wonderfully Ibsenian. It is a commentary not on fundamentalism but on democracy (or the absence of it). As such it will be controversial and will upset many people in the audience (as all of your plays do anyway).
1) Page 7, Scene 4, 7th Line from Bottom: Might it not be funnier if you changed "LTG" to "LPG"?
2) Scene 13, Page 39, Line 1: MURAD is referred to as Brother again, rather than as Father. In his first appearance he was Brother, in later scenes as Father, and here once more as Brother.
3) Scene 15, Page 42, Line 4: Same comment as above. MURAD continues to be referred to as Brother even after this line.
4) Proofread your work carefully, especially for grammar.
5) Would your rather use "Pink Dot" or a fictionalized group name?
6) I understand that you are torn between titling the play The Burning (too Stephen King-y) and My Children Are Virgins after deciding not to title it The Fundamentalist Father. The word "Children" ties up this play with your previous "family" plays (My Mother Buys Condoms, My Father Wears Bras). The word "Virgins", though, is a bit off. Instead of the word "Are", choose an active verb, something like My Children Worship Me, My Children Come Home, or something contrapuntal and ironic.
Congratulations on completing a trilogy. I hope that the last two can be produced, after which all three can be published in their definitive, production versions.
Just a few comments--otherwise your play is ready for a staged reading or, hopefully, a full production. It is dark yet funny and wonderfully Ibsenian. It is a commentary not on fundamentalism but on democracy (or the absence of it). As such it will be controversial and will upset many people in the audience (as all of your plays do anyway).
1) Page 7, Scene 4, 7th Line from Bottom: Might it not be funnier if you changed "LTG" to "LPG"?
2) Scene 13, Page 39, Line 1: MURAD is referred to as Brother again, rather than as Father. In his first appearance he was Brother, in later scenes as Father, and here once more as Brother.
3) Scene 15, Page 42, Line 4: Same comment as above. MURAD continues to be referred to as Brother even after this line.
4) Proofread your work carefully, especially for grammar.
5) Would your rather use "Pink Dot" or a fictionalized group name?
6) I understand that you are torn between titling the play The Burning (too Stephen King-y) and My Children Are Virgins after deciding not to title it The Fundamentalist Father. The word "Children" ties up this play with your previous "family" plays (My Mother Buys Condoms, My Father Wears Bras). The word "Virgins", though, is a bit off. Instead of the word "Are", choose an active verb, something like My Children Worship Me, My Children Come Home, or something contrapuntal and ironic.
Congratulations on completing a trilogy. I hope that the last two can be produced, after which all three can be published in their definitive, production versions.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Kor Kor Cheh Cheh Di Di Mei Mei_ by Flora
Hello Flora!
Your play is actually developing well. You now have a better knowledge of your characters and the issues that create the conflict they should be going through.
You are stuck because, for each set of characters, there should be one character who provides conflict to propel the play forward (either an additional character for Kelly and Wayne; and either Jessica to Josh or Josh to Jessica). As it is, Kelly and Wayne are mainly in agreement and merely planning for the future, and Jessica and Josh are ambling along to a prospective visit to their mother. When you laid down your plot, all of the points of conflict were in the PAST. Bring them forward to the present.
Balance the scenes between the first set of characters and the second set of characters by alternating from one set to the other. In your draft you initially did that, then followed through with the Wayne/Jessica set in a clinic, and then a mall, and then back to their house.
Visualize a generic set. As a scene ends for one set of characters, it should OVERLAP with the beginning scene for the second set of characters. The characters of the second set enter even as the characters of the first set are still there. However, the characters of the first set DO NOT SEE the characters of the second set, and vice-versa.
Follow all of these guidelines. I assure you that you will come up with an exciting play.
Your play is actually developing well. You now have a better knowledge of your characters and the issues that create the conflict they should be going through.
You are stuck because, for each set of characters, there should be one character who provides conflict to propel the play forward (either an additional character for Kelly and Wayne; and either Jessica to Josh or Josh to Jessica). As it is, Kelly and Wayne are mainly in agreement and merely planning for the future, and Jessica and Josh are ambling along to a prospective visit to their mother. When you laid down your plot, all of the points of conflict were in the PAST. Bring them forward to the present.
Balance the scenes between the first set of characters and the second set of characters by alternating from one set to the other. In your draft you initially did that, then followed through with the Wayne/Jessica set in a clinic, and then a mall, and then back to their house.
Visualize a generic set. As a scene ends for one set of characters, it should OVERLAP with the beginning scene for the second set of characters. The characters of the second set enter even as the characters of the first set are still there. However, the characters of the first set DO NOT SEE the characters of the second set, and vice-versa.
Follow all of these guidelines. I assure you that you will come up with an exciting play.
Saturday, January 19, 2019
In-Depth Writing Exercise #9: Your Personal Fairy Tale
1) Make a list of all the fairy tales and children's stories you can remember.
2) Go over the list and identify the fairy tale or children's story you like most.
3) Juxtapose the narrative over your life script. How is the main character like you? How are the other characters like the people who surround you? How are the conflicts like your present conflicts? How is the plot like your life?
4) Rewrite the fairy tale or children's story with you as the main character, keeping the narrative as parallel or as close to your life.
5) Give your plot a happy ending.
6) Keep a copy of your work as visible as possible in your writing area so that you are constantly reminded of it. (You may revise the narrative from time to time as you wish.)
Yes, you CAN author your life. All you have to do is go ahead and do it.
2) Go over the list and identify the fairy tale or children's story you like most.
3) Juxtapose the narrative over your life script. How is the main character like you? How are the other characters like the people who surround you? How are the conflicts like your present conflicts? How is the plot like your life?
4) Rewrite the fairy tale or children's story with you as the main character, keeping the narrative as parallel or as close to your life.
5) Give your plot a happy ending.
6) Keep a copy of your work as visible as possible in your writing area so that you are constantly reminded of it. (You may revise the narrative from time to time as you wish.)
Yes, you CAN author your life. All you have to do is go ahead and do it.
Tuesday, January 8, 2019
Thursday, January 3, 2019
Monday, December 17, 2018
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks: "The Promise" by Ivan
Hello Ivan!
Thank you for completing your play. When I read it this time around, it came across as poignant and lyrical.
Here are my comments:
1) Scene 1, Page 1: Second to the Last Line: Change "It is dramatic!" to "It is melodramatic!' (Or tacky, or kitschy, or artificial, not dramatic).
2) Proofread your dialogue well. Some examples: You wrote "worst than" rather than "worse than", "loose" rather than "lose", and "Flashback to today" rather than "Flashforward to today".
3) In any script, don't write "What the f**?" Spell the word out. Otherwise the performer will pronounce the line as "What the F-Asterisk-Asterisk?"
4) In an early scene Andy says he is straight rather than gay. He was lying, then?
5) Scene 14 employs a flashback technique that does not go with the rest of the play. I suggest that you convert this scene to a video.
Additional comments:
1) You need highly credible performers for this play, but I am sure that your director will find them, because Singapore has many, talented actors and actresses.
2) The production is best held inside a cafe, with the audience seated round cafe tables and actually eating dinner. And with real waters going round between scenes.
3) This might be classified as an "Adults Only" play.
4) Your prospective producers could be groups like Pink Dot. HOWEVER, go over your play and decide what it is actually saying about gay culture.
If you are satisfied with the state that your play is in (I know that you mulled over it and reworked it several times), clean it up and submit it to TheatreWorks for a staged reading. While its audience is restricted, I found it very enjoyable, and I liked the interactions between the male characters and the one female character in your cast.
Thank you for completing your play. When I read it this time around, it came across as poignant and lyrical.
Here are my comments:
1) Scene 1, Page 1: Second to the Last Line: Change "It is dramatic!" to "It is melodramatic!' (Or tacky, or kitschy, or artificial, not dramatic).
2) Proofread your dialogue well. Some examples: You wrote "worst than" rather than "worse than", "loose" rather than "lose", and "Flashback to today" rather than "Flashforward to today".
3) In any script, don't write "What the f**?" Spell the word out. Otherwise the performer will pronounce the line as "What the F-Asterisk-Asterisk?"
4) In an early scene Andy says he is straight rather than gay. He was lying, then?
5) Scene 14 employs a flashback technique that does not go with the rest of the play. I suggest that you convert this scene to a video.
Additional comments:
1) You need highly credible performers for this play, but I am sure that your director will find them, because Singapore has many, talented actors and actresses.
2) The production is best held inside a cafe, with the audience seated round cafe tables and actually eating dinner. And with real waters going round between scenes.
3) This might be classified as an "Adults Only" play.
4) Your prospective producers could be groups like Pink Dot. HOWEVER, go over your play and decide what it is actually saying about gay culture.
If you are satisfied with the state that your play is in (I know that you mulled over it and reworked it several times), clean it up and submit it to TheatreWorks for a staged reading. While its audience is restricted, I found it very enjoyable, and I liked the interactions between the male characters and the one female character in your cast.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Final Call_ by Timothy
Hello Tim! (Still unable to call you Yam because the name reminds me of purple yams, which I like for dessert.)
Congratulations on completing a brillant and insightful play! TheatreWorks wll certainly give it a staged reading, but if they won't give it a full production and if you have theatre friends in San Francisco, New York, or Melbourne, I urge you to test the waters in those places. Travel by air--and all kinds of human movement involving bureaucracy, for that matter--has become a worldwide nightmare. Your play pushes it over the edge and converts it to a devastating night terror.
I agree that the play takes on different dimensions depending on whether the AIRLINE REP is a man or a woman. The REP, to me anyway, is best played by a man in order to function as a counterfoil to JONES, who is a man. Having said that, the entire play is a director's delight: it can be played by clowns in costume, it can be played by marionettes, and the set could be anything from nothing to black-and-white to a high-tech affair.
Consider "I'm coming home soon" instead of "I'm coming home now" as the penultimate line of the play. It is more intriguing and suggests further unpredictability.
Do a final clean-up before submitting your play to TheatreWorks. Trim it as best you can. Like Nanda's and Danial's plays, your play is LONG, and the sad reality about theatre in the 21st century is that audiences (and producers) are less and less willing to sit through protracted productions. Indeed, gone are the days of the hao-kah, which played from sunset through sunrise.
Congratulations on completing a brillant and insightful play! TheatreWorks wll certainly give it a staged reading, but if they won't give it a full production and if you have theatre friends in San Francisco, New York, or Melbourne, I urge you to test the waters in those places. Travel by air--and all kinds of human movement involving bureaucracy, for that matter--has become a worldwide nightmare. Your play pushes it over the edge and converts it to a devastating night terror.
I agree that the play takes on different dimensions depending on whether the AIRLINE REP is a man or a woman. The REP, to me anyway, is best played by a man in order to function as a counterfoil to JONES, who is a man. Having said that, the entire play is a director's delight: it can be played by clowns in costume, it can be played by marionettes, and the set could be anything from nothing to black-and-white to a high-tech affair.
Consider "I'm coming home soon" instead of "I'm coming home now" as the penultimate line of the play. It is more intriguing and suggests further unpredictability.
Do a final clean-up before submitting your play to TheatreWorks. Trim it as best you can. Like Nanda's and Danial's plays, your play is LONG, and the sad reality about theatre in the 21st century is that audiences (and producers) are less and less willing to sit through protracted productions. Indeed, gone are the days of the hao-kah, which played from sunset through sunrise.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Two Halves Make A Hole_ by Danial
Hello Danial!
First of all, congratulations for providing the well-thought-out and well-located additions to your play.
I suggest that you rephrase passages that have question-and-answer dialogue. Characters speak because of a NEED to speak, not because someone asked them a question and they have to provide an answer.
Do a final trim before submitting this play to TheatreWorks. After they assign your play to a director, he or she will most certainly make cuts due to the constraint of running time. As I advised Nanda regarding his play, you might as well do the initial cuts yourself rather than disagree with what the director decides to cut later.
Other than those, good work!
I hope that I will be in Singapore to watch the staged reading of your play.
First of all, congratulations for providing the well-thought-out and well-located additions to your play.
I suggest that you rephrase passages that have question-and-answer dialogue. Characters speak because of a NEED to speak, not because someone asked them a question and they have to provide an answer.
Do a final trim before submitting this play to TheatreWorks. After they assign your play to a director, he or she will most certainly make cuts due to the constraint of running time. As I advised Nanda regarding his play, you might as well do the initial cuts yourself rather than disagree with what the director decides to cut later.
Other than those, good work!
I hope that I will be in Singapore to watch the staged reading of your play.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Satamilla_ by Aswani
Hello Aswani!
You've done a substantial amount of work on your play. The scenes are more stageable, the characters are more real, and you have the gift of writing compelling dialogue.
Just a few more comments on this draft:
1) Scene 3 seems underwritten. Make an effort to have all your scenes balanced--in content and in length. You also need to justify YOUNGER SUSEELA's presence. The audience won't know what's going on.
2) The presence of YOUNGER SUSEELA in succeeding scenes is also perplexing and apparently unjustified.
3) Each of your scenes is dynamic, but always be careful not to push the dramatic to the melodramatic.
4) Scene 7 is disjointed because you wrote this in chunks rather than allow the scene to write itself. Never think in terms of fragments--you will only end up with Procrustean, stilted results.
Same comment for Scene 12.
Whenever you are unable to follow a scene through, ask yourself whether the scene is evoking emotional truth within you. Go with the emotion; don't fight it off or block it. Remember our lesson on the defense mechanisms. You need to drop your defenses and allow yourself to be vulnerable in order to be an effective playwright.
5) Go through your stage directions again for clarity and economy. For instance, instead of writing "He returns back", just write "He returns".
6) Scene 9 is static. You could bring it to life by giving cause for SANJEEVAN to have a breakdown. Externalize his internal conflict.
7) In Scene 10, well into the play, the presence of YOUNG SUSEELA is still unclear and apparently useless.
8) In Scene 12, for the first time the character YOUNG SANJEEVAN appears. Work him into the earlier scenes. Develop a dramatic, albeit metaphysical, relationship between YOUNG SUSEELA and YOUNG SANJEEVAN if possible. If you can swing this, your play will be truly masterful.
9) In the entire script, always identify YOUNG SANJEEVAN as YOUNG SANJEEVAN and not as SANJEEVAN.
10) Scene 13. I love your death meditation!
11) Scene 14 (B) is also underwritten. The symbolism of the peacock feather is lost unless a significant reference to it is made in a previous scene.
12) Scene 17. The ending of your play is too abrupt--almost as though you were afraid to touch it. Provide catharsis for your audience. You owe it to them. An elegy in which all of the characters (including SUSEELA) rise to address the audience is one solution. It is also the best time and opportunity for the voices of YOUNG SUSEELA and YOUNG SANJEEVAN to be heard. An alternative is to give the entire elegy to SANJEEVAN.
Be persistent, be tenacious, and always keep in mind that producing a work of literary art, like a huge tapestry, needs time and patience. Every color and every thread must fall in place.
I look forward to receiving the next draft of your play.
You've done a substantial amount of work on your play. The scenes are more stageable, the characters are more real, and you have the gift of writing compelling dialogue.
Just a few more comments on this draft:
1) Scene 3 seems underwritten. Make an effort to have all your scenes balanced--in content and in length. You also need to justify YOUNGER SUSEELA's presence. The audience won't know what's going on.
2) The presence of YOUNGER SUSEELA in succeeding scenes is also perplexing and apparently unjustified.
3) Each of your scenes is dynamic, but always be careful not to push the dramatic to the melodramatic.
4) Scene 7 is disjointed because you wrote this in chunks rather than allow the scene to write itself. Never think in terms of fragments--you will only end up with Procrustean, stilted results.
Same comment for Scene 12.
Whenever you are unable to follow a scene through, ask yourself whether the scene is evoking emotional truth within you. Go with the emotion; don't fight it off or block it. Remember our lesson on the defense mechanisms. You need to drop your defenses and allow yourself to be vulnerable in order to be an effective playwright.
5) Go through your stage directions again for clarity and economy. For instance, instead of writing "He returns back", just write "He returns".
6) Scene 9 is static. You could bring it to life by giving cause for SANJEEVAN to have a breakdown. Externalize his internal conflict.
7) In Scene 10, well into the play, the presence of YOUNG SUSEELA is still unclear and apparently useless.
8) In Scene 12, for the first time the character YOUNG SANJEEVAN appears. Work him into the earlier scenes. Develop a dramatic, albeit metaphysical, relationship between YOUNG SUSEELA and YOUNG SANJEEVAN if possible. If you can swing this, your play will be truly masterful.
9) In the entire script, always identify YOUNG SANJEEVAN as YOUNG SANJEEVAN and not as SANJEEVAN.
10) Scene 13. I love your death meditation!
11) Scene 14 (B) is also underwritten. The symbolism of the peacock feather is lost unless a significant reference to it is made in a previous scene.
12) Scene 17. The ending of your play is too abrupt--almost as though you were afraid to touch it. Provide catharsis for your audience. You owe it to them. An elegy in which all of the characters (including SUSEELA) rise to address the audience is one solution. It is also the best time and opportunity for the voices of YOUNG SUSEELA and YOUNG SANJEEVAN to be heard. An alternative is to give the entire elegy to SANJEEVAN.
Be persistent, be tenacious, and always keep in mind that producing a work of literary art, like a huge tapestry, needs time and patience. Every color and every thread must fall in place.
I look forward to receiving the next draft of your play.
Friday, November 30, 2018
Wednesday, November 28, 2018
Friday, November 23, 2018
Monday, November 19, 2018
Saturday, November 10, 2018
Friday, November 9, 2018
Thursday, November 8, 2018
Wednesday, November 7, 2018
Tuesday, November 6, 2018
Saturday, November 3, 2018
Recalling Seasons And Occasions
Wake up in the morning as though you were waking up to Christmas Day, New Year's Day, your next birthday, your first day of school or work, or any special day of your choice.
Record first your feelings, then your immediate thoughts, then free-associations, then the persons you wish to share this day with.
Are you able to recreate this moment or this day with all five physical senses?
What are the body signals (tingles, buzzes, goosebumps) that come with your reflections? Can you activate these signals at will should you want to in the future?
What is the color of this day?
What is the symbol of this day?
What is the scent of this day?
What is your wish for this day?
Record first your feelings, then your immediate thoughts, then free-associations, then the persons you wish to share this day with.
Are you able to recreate this moment or this day with all five physical senses?
What are the body signals (tingles, buzzes, goosebumps) that come with your reflections? Can you activate these signals at will should you want to in the future?
What is the color of this day?
What is the symbol of this day?
What is the scent of this day?
What is your wish for this day?
Sunday, October 28, 2018
Wednesday, October 24, 2018
Friday, October 19, 2018
At the end of each day, before going to bed, write down everything you did and ate and said, everywhere you went, everyone you interacted with, and everything you thought from the time you woke up, and see how much you really remember.
This is an exercise in breaking down the defense mechanism repression, in strengthening your powers of observation, and in embracing both the pleasant and the unpleasant toward achieving inner balance.
This is an exercise in breaking down the defense mechanism repression, in strengthening your powers of observation, and in embracing both the pleasant and the unpleasant toward achieving inner balance.
Thursday, October 18, 2018
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Malavika_ by Nanda
Hello Nanda!
First, your play was already cleverly conceived before our first meeting. You are one of those playwrights whose plays are written in full inside one's head so that, when they are ready to be written, they just flow onto hard copy. After our discussion session, electronic dramaturgy, the videotaped, informal reading that I watched with you, and our restructuring, your play is finally finished. It was interesting to dramaturge because it is the second of a trilogy, the first already written and staged, the third, yet to be written. Still, it must be able to stand up as an independent piece--and it does.
A few comments:
--I noted the additions you made to contribute to the sensual atmosphere of the play.
--All of the roles are vehicles for fine, ensemble acting. I wonder, though, whether a static, staged reading will diminish their impact.
--The play is too long. Act 3 seems to have the most tolerable length. I suggest that you read it aloud (or do so again with the help of your friends) and time each act. Tighten the play: make your cuts now rather than wait for the director to make cuts you might not agree with.
Then proofread your manuscript, make a clean copy, and submit it to TheatreWorks for a staged reading.
Well done!
First, your play was already cleverly conceived before our first meeting. You are one of those playwrights whose plays are written in full inside one's head so that, when they are ready to be written, they just flow onto hard copy. After our discussion session, electronic dramaturgy, the videotaped, informal reading that I watched with you, and our restructuring, your play is finally finished. It was interesting to dramaturge because it is the second of a trilogy, the first already written and staged, the third, yet to be written. Still, it must be able to stand up as an independent piece--and it does.
A few comments:
--I noted the additions you made to contribute to the sensual atmosphere of the play.
--All of the roles are vehicles for fine, ensemble acting. I wonder, though, whether a static, staged reading will diminish their impact.
--The play is too long. Act 3 seems to have the most tolerable length. I suggest that you read it aloud (or do so again with the help of your friends) and time each act. Tighten the play: make your cuts now rather than wait for the director to make cuts you might not agree with.
Then proofread your manuscript, make a clean copy, and submit it to TheatreWorks for a staged reading.
Well done!
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Mixed_ by Raemae
Hello Raemae!
It's been a long journey, but you've proven to have the constant passion and the tenacity to see your play through. After two rounds of dramaturgy and an informal reading I was fortunate enough to sit in five months ago, I am pleased to reread your play and see that you've made very judicious changes/additions.
Technically, each act in your play is really a cluster of scenes; you might want to reconsider calling your divisions not acts but something else, in case the definitive, post-production, version of your play finds publication.
Proofread your manuscript once again, especially for grammar, and clean it up before submitting it to TheatreWorks for a staged reading. Keep in mind that the staged reading will have a director and a professional cast, and be open to their suggestions. Theatre is teamwork after all, and the last thing you want is a director and a cast that will be unhappy rehearsing a play they don't feel comfortable with, night after night.
In the meantime, congratulations! If I'm lucky I might be in the audience for your staged reading.
It's been a long journey, but you've proven to have the constant passion and the tenacity to see your play through. After two rounds of dramaturgy and an informal reading I was fortunate enough to sit in five months ago, I am pleased to reread your play and see that you've made very judicious changes/additions.
Technically, each act in your play is really a cluster of scenes; you might want to reconsider calling your divisions not acts but something else, in case the definitive, post-production, version of your play finds publication.
Proofread your manuscript once again, especially for grammar, and clean it up before submitting it to TheatreWorks for a staged reading. Keep in mind that the staged reading will have a director and a professional cast, and be open to their suggestions. Theatre is teamwork after all, and the last thing you want is a director and a cast that will be unhappy rehearsing a play they don't feel comfortable with, night after night.
In the meantime, congratulations! If I'm lucky I might be in the audience for your staged reading.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: "The Book of Mothers" by Eleanor
Hello Eleanor!
Thank you for writing this wonderful play. Here are my comments:
--Scene 5 is mainly exposition. Provide dramatic tension between the two men. While this is really a feminist play, you need to flesh out your male characters and render them as real persons. Give your male performers acting roles they can be proud to assume.
--Consider eliminating male characters altogether, rewriting the scenes that have them into monologues or reports.
--It is possible to envision the performer of CHILD as a young adult, rather than casting a real child. Casting children in plays usually creates production problems due to scheduling.
--Your real drama begins in Scene 7.
--I offer you two options:
1) Write a second act in which the events are repeated, but with a different, upbeat ending. It is then up to the audience to decide which is the real act and which is the fantasy act. This will elevate your one-act play to a full-length play.
2) Interweave the real act and the fantasy act, keeping the piece a one-act play. Explore your subject matter. Squeeze every bit of imagery out of it.
3) In one act, CHILD should be female. In the other, male. This will provide more dynamics to your message.
While further developing your play, put more of yourself (your selves, actually, since playwrights really have multiple personalities) in your work. Do not be ashamed or embarrassed to show your characters and their emotions inside out.
In all, though, well done! Persist and see this through.
Thank you for writing this wonderful play. Here are my comments:
--Scene 5 is mainly exposition. Provide dramatic tension between the two men. While this is really a feminist play, you need to flesh out your male characters and render them as real persons. Give your male performers acting roles they can be proud to assume.
--Consider eliminating male characters altogether, rewriting the scenes that have them into monologues or reports.
--It is possible to envision the performer of CHILD as a young adult, rather than casting a real child. Casting children in plays usually creates production problems due to scheduling.
--Your real drama begins in Scene 7.
--I offer you two options:
1) Write a second act in which the events are repeated, but with a different, upbeat ending. It is then up to the audience to decide which is the real act and which is the fantasy act. This will elevate your one-act play to a full-length play.
2) Interweave the real act and the fantasy act, keeping the piece a one-act play. Explore your subject matter. Squeeze every bit of imagery out of it.
3) In one act, CHILD should be female. In the other, male. This will provide more dynamics to your message.
While further developing your play, put more of yourself (your selves, actually, since playwrights really have multiple personalities) in your work. Do not be ashamed or embarrassed to show your characters and their emotions inside out.
In all, though, well done! Persist and see this through.
Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Kor Kor Cheh Cheh Di Di Mei Mei_ by Flora
Hello Flora!
Your play concept is interesting, and you should begin writing it along the following guidelines:
--First, know your four protagonists deeply and intimately before even bringing them onstage.
--Be mindful of points of attack for your two parallel plots.
--Allow both plots to converge not once but several times within the entire play.
--This play and its treatment verge on the cinematic and the melodramatic, so be careful to keep it a dramatic stage play.
Finally, do not be intimidated by the submissions and speed of progress of your co-participants. Focus only on yourself and your own work. Go into your fantasy writing room and shut out everyone and everything else.
Now, plunge into writing.
Your play concept is interesting, and you should begin writing it along the following guidelines:
--First, know your four protagonists deeply and intimately before even bringing them onstage.
--Be mindful of points of attack for your two parallel plots.
--Allow both plots to converge not once but several times within the entire play.
--This play and its treatment verge on the cinematic and the melodramatic, so be careful to keep it a dramatic stage play.
Finally, do not be intimidated by the submissions and speed of progress of your co-participants. Focus only on yourself and your own work. Go into your fantasy writing room and shut out everyone and everything else.
Now, plunge into writing.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: "Project X" by Adi
Hello Adi!
You've written a very interesting one-act play. This isn't the play you began writing during our workshop, though--that was longer, more complex, and more ambitious.
At this point, would you like to develop this particular play further as a one-act play? That is quite all right. We can go with this for now, but I advise you to write full-length plays afterward; this will propel you faster to become a major Singaporean playwright, which I know you can be, especially with your flair for characterization and dialogue.
My comments on your manuscript:
--Always be aware of stage business. What are the characters doing? If they are sneaking into a room and spying on someone they would be huddled most of the time and their use of stage space would be restricted. They would also have to be speaking in whispers.
--You have a single walk-on toward the end of the play. Is this necessary? How challenged would a performer be to do this walk-on? Would he even include this project in his portfolio? Always think of your director and your performers and how their talents can shine.
Consider several walk-ons that would compel your characters to have a variety of reactions and a variety of movements.
--Keep in mind that it takes thousands, if not millions, of dollars for a producer to stage a play. Producers will bank on financially viable projects. Ensure that your play, no matter how short or how long, has a new, unique, and non-whimsical message for your prospective audiences.
You've written a very interesting one-act play. This isn't the play you began writing during our workshop, though--that was longer, more complex, and more ambitious.
At this point, would you like to develop this particular play further as a one-act play? That is quite all right. We can go with this for now, but I advise you to write full-length plays afterward; this will propel you faster to become a major Singaporean playwright, which I know you can be, especially with your flair for characterization and dialogue.
My comments on your manuscript:
--Always be aware of stage business. What are the characters doing? If they are sneaking into a room and spying on someone they would be huddled most of the time and their use of stage space would be restricted. They would also have to be speaking in whispers.
--You have a single walk-on toward the end of the play. Is this necessary? How challenged would a performer be to do this walk-on? Would he even include this project in his portfolio? Always think of your director and your performers and how their talents can shine.
Consider several walk-ons that would compel your characters to have a variety of reactions and a variety of movements.
--Keep in mind that it takes thousands, if not millions, of dollars for a producer to stage a play. Producers will bank on financially viable projects. Ensure that your play, no matter how short or how long, has a new, unique, and non-whimsical message for your prospective audiences.
Monday, October 15, 2018
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _FInal Call_ by Timothy
Hello Timothy!
Your play flowed so well that I was disappointed to see that your manuscript ended, unfinished, on Page 41. I hope that I can read your entire play very soon.
All of your dialogue is witty and sparkling, and every line contributes to characterization. The genre you seem to have chosen for this piece is Theatre of the Absurd, which emerged in the 1960s from industrialization, mechanization, and the subsequent de-humanization of relationships in well-developed countries. In Asia, this works very well in Singapore, Japan, Korea, and China, not due to industrialization and mechanization but to giant leaps in technology.
You have an incisive, Kafkaesque mind that endows your protagonist with a unique point of view that, at the same time, comes across as valid social commentary. Your second act seemed too short in comparison with the first, but that, of course, was due to the fact that your manuscript is unfinished. Keep in mind that both acts should be balanced--bring back the other characters even if they must appear as yet other characters played by the same performers. This will keep your play well-structured.
Even in its present state, your play is already very well-polished. Be sensitive, however, to nuances in language. On Page 1, Lines 3, 19, and 20, for instance, the line "We bring you to where you need to be" is more correctly stated "We bring you where you need to be". also on Page 1, the Airline Rep's line "...passengers of Flight 1949 to..." is usually, in airports, "..passengers of Flight 1949 bound for..."
Well done!
Your play flowed so well that I was disappointed to see that your manuscript ended, unfinished, on Page 41. I hope that I can read your entire play very soon.
All of your dialogue is witty and sparkling, and every line contributes to characterization. The genre you seem to have chosen for this piece is Theatre of the Absurd, which emerged in the 1960s from industrialization, mechanization, and the subsequent de-humanization of relationships in well-developed countries. In Asia, this works very well in Singapore, Japan, Korea, and China, not due to industrialization and mechanization but to giant leaps in technology.
You have an incisive, Kafkaesque mind that endows your protagonist with a unique point of view that, at the same time, comes across as valid social commentary. Your second act seemed too short in comparison with the first, but that, of course, was due to the fact that your manuscript is unfinished. Keep in mind that both acts should be balanced--bring back the other characters even if they must appear as yet other characters played by the same performers. This will keep your play well-structured.
Even in its present state, your play is already very well-polished. Be sensitive, however, to nuances in language. On Page 1, Lines 3, 19, and 20, for instance, the line "We bring you to where you need to be" is more correctly stated "We bring you where you need to be". also on Page 1, the Airline Rep's line "...passengers of Flight 1949 to..." is usually, in airports, "..passengers of Flight 1949 bound for..."
Well done!
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: "At The End of the Road" by Pearlyn
Hello Pearlyn!
I commend you on following through with this play from our recently concluded workshop. It is currently a one-act play as you envisioned it to be, but it can and should be developed into a full-length play, not necessarily divided into acts. Otherwise every event that transpires after Sarah's accident is abrupt and functions as deus ex machina. Between Scenes 2 and 3, for example, you need to go deeper into Sarah's mind and how she comes to her decision to be a martyr for her husband's cause.
Your play swiftly generates conflict, which is a good thing. Like a clever musical composer, though, you should be able to carry it through the play and take it to the climax that it deserves. You can do this--I perceive it from reading the dialogue that you wrote between man and wife and from the psychological dynamics between them. If you succeed, you could even very well be on your way to be Singapore's modern Strindberg.
Before proceeding any further, explore the genre of noir. Read all of Cornell Woolrich's novels, beginning with The Night Has A Thousand Eyes. Your public library should have them. And then, flesh out your play.
Do not be concerned with time constraints. Enjoy what you are writing. Even if it takes you a year or more, the most important thing is that you come up with a stage-worthy, dramatic play.
I commend you on following through with this play from our recently concluded workshop. It is currently a one-act play as you envisioned it to be, but it can and should be developed into a full-length play, not necessarily divided into acts. Otherwise every event that transpires after Sarah's accident is abrupt and functions as deus ex machina. Between Scenes 2 and 3, for example, you need to go deeper into Sarah's mind and how she comes to her decision to be a martyr for her husband's cause.
Your play swiftly generates conflict, which is a good thing. Like a clever musical composer, though, you should be able to carry it through the play and take it to the climax that it deserves. You can do this--I perceive it from reading the dialogue that you wrote between man and wife and from the psychological dynamics between them. If you succeed, you could even very well be on your way to be Singapore's modern Strindberg.
Before proceeding any further, explore the genre of noir. Read all of Cornell Woolrich's novels, beginning with The Night Has A Thousand Eyes. Your public library should have them. And then, flesh out your play.
Do not be concerned with time constraints. Enjoy what you are writing. Even if it takes you a year or more, the most important thing is that you come up with a stage-worthy, dramatic play.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: "Ah Ma Goes Home" by Michelle
Hello Michelle!
Your play is still undeveloped as it was before, but its subject matter is very interesting. If you feel that you are having a difficult time advancing, first ask yourself the following:
1) Have you chosen the best medium for your message? Is your story better suited to a novel or a movie rather than to a stage play?
2) Which language is your play coming out more consistently in?
3) Who will come out as the real protagonist of the play, Ah Mah or the Narrator?
Your premise is not yet clear, but your draft is promising. I hope that you can work on it some more.
So far, if this were a novel, the structure is after Boris Pasternak's Dr. Zhivago, and if this were a play, the structure is after Tennessee Williams's "The Glass Menagerie".
Your play is still undeveloped as it was before, but its subject matter is very interesting. If you feel that you are having a difficult time advancing, first ask yourself the following:
1) Have you chosen the best medium for your message? Is your story better suited to a novel or a movie rather than to a stage play?
2) Which language is your play coming out more consistently in?
3) Who will come out as the real protagonist of the play, Ah Mah or the Narrator?
Your premise is not yet clear, but your draft is promising. I hope that you can work on it some more.
So far, if this were a novel, the structure is after Boris Pasternak's Dr. Zhivago, and if this were a play, the structure is after Tennessee Williams's "The Glass Menagerie".
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Satamilla (Without Sound)_ by Aswani
Hello Aswani!
Your manuscript is mature and lyrical, and reflects a creative sense of staging.
Here are my comments:
1) Your title should either be Satamilla OR Without Sound. Do not include translations in parentheses.
2) Proofread your work carefully. Do NOT take stage directions for granted--they guide not only the director but also the performers and your readers. On Page 3, 7th Line from the Bottom, you have "SANJEEVAN closes the door to exit", which should read "SANJEEVAN exits and closes the door behind him".
3) Scenes 2 and 3 are underwritten, as though they were mere transition scenes in a movie or TV episode. Give both scenes dramatic substance. Both scenes should demonstrate your premise more clearly.
4) I love your juxtaposition of past and present. It is as though your play were really about reincarnation and the flashbacks are not scenes from the immediate past but scenes from a previous lifetime. (Although, in a sense, they are.)
5) How do you visualize the seduction in Scene 6: Is SUSEELA 2 performing onstage alone? If the MAN is physically absent in this scene, won't the audience infer that this scene from the past is merely a figment of SUSEELA's imagination?
6) Be aware of frequent scene changes that require complete set-ups of furniture and props. I have yet to see a revolving stage at TheatreWorks.
7) Scene 7: This is SUSEELA 2 on the stage, not SUSEELA, but you neglected to indicate so.
8) On Page 12, Last Line, YU LING says, "...I know that Mother Mary is around you..." Then on Page 13, Line 5, she says, "I'm from a Buddhist family..." The audience might laugh out loud, unless that is your intention.
9) Always keep in mind that both SANJEEVAN and SUSEELA must have well-developed characters. One should not merely be a sounding board for the other.
Do proceed with this play along the above guidelines. I look forward to seeing how it develops and how it ends.
Your manuscript is mature and lyrical, and reflects a creative sense of staging.
Here are my comments:
1) Your title should either be Satamilla OR Without Sound. Do not include translations in parentheses.
2) Proofread your work carefully. Do NOT take stage directions for granted--they guide not only the director but also the performers and your readers. On Page 3, 7th Line from the Bottom, you have "SANJEEVAN closes the door to exit", which should read "SANJEEVAN exits and closes the door behind him".
3) Scenes 2 and 3 are underwritten, as though they were mere transition scenes in a movie or TV episode. Give both scenes dramatic substance. Both scenes should demonstrate your premise more clearly.
4) I love your juxtaposition of past and present. It is as though your play were really about reincarnation and the flashbacks are not scenes from the immediate past but scenes from a previous lifetime. (Although, in a sense, they are.)
5) How do you visualize the seduction in Scene 6: Is SUSEELA 2 performing onstage alone? If the MAN is physically absent in this scene, won't the audience infer that this scene from the past is merely a figment of SUSEELA's imagination?
6) Be aware of frequent scene changes that require complete set-ups of furniture and props. I have yet to see a revolving stage at TheatreWorks.
7) Scene 7: This is SUSEELA 2 on the stage, not SUSEELA, but you neglected to indicate so.
8) On Page 12, Last Line, YU LING says, "...I know that Mother Mary is around you..." Then on Page 13, Line 5, she says, "I'm from a Buddhist family..." The audience might laugh out loud, unless that is your intention.
9) Always keep in mind that both SANJEEVAN and SUSEELA must have well-developed characters. One should not merely be a sounding board for the other.
Do proceed with this play along the above guidelines. I look forward to seeing how it develops and how it ends.
Monday, October 8, 2018
Saturday, October 6, 2018
Sunday, September 30, 2018
When starting out a novel, write your first two pages, set them aside, and come back to them a day later to see if your lines sound right. If they don't--if they are stilted and the lines don't flow--it is because you are writing it in the wrong language. Switch to another language, such as Chinese, Bahasa, Hindi, or Tagalog.
If you INSIST on writing your novel in a preferred language, talk to yourself in a running monologue in that language while you are alone in your room. When you think your thoughts, think in that language. Only then should you resume writing your novel.
Friday, August 3, 2018
Wednesday, August 1, 2018
Sunday, July 29, 2018
Tuesday, July 17, 2018
Tuesday, June 19, 2018
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks: _Malavika_ by Nanda
Hello Nanda!
This is a good, first draft not only of your play but also of your projected trilogy as we discussed it the last time we met.
1) First, read Agatha Christie's The Secret of Chimneys--not that it has anything to do with your play but because of her expert handling of presenting clues and masking identities.
2) Your mysterious showcasing of the character Malavika is commendable. Ensure, however, that she is spiritually present even when she is physically absent in scenes.
3) Is the character Ira necessary? How does she embody the premise? Her presence in the first scene might lead the audience to believe that the play is all about her. Remember that your play is about being a man and being a husband, not being a parent.
4) In the TV scene and the birthday scene, which you tend to overdevelop by making everyone talk of trivialities, your story stops moving forward. Be aware that your genre is poetic realism, not realism.
5) Eliminate unnecessary subplots. Your focus is Agni-Malavika.
6) In a mystery play (not in the medieval sense), a playwright will always allow his audience to be ten steps ahead of the storyteller. No surprises should be sprung.
7) No matter what the subject matter, begin your play as close to the climax as possible.
Take a rest and mull over your play before rewriting it.
Diagram your trilogy on a piece of paper and write, under each play title, what you need to achieve in each play. You will find that the less characters you have, the more substantial your work will be.
You may not be able to rewrite this draft in time for my arrival in Singapore. However, I will be happy to meet you anyway, to discuss what difficulties you may be having.
This is a good, first draft not only of your play but also of your projected trilogy as we discussed it the last time we met.
1) First, read Agatha Christie's The Secret of Chimneys--not that it has anything to do with your play but because of her expert handling of presenting clues and masking identities.
2) Your mysterious showcasing of the character Malavika is commendable. Ensure, however, that she is spiritually present even when she is physically absent in scenes.
3) Is the character Ira necessary? How does she embody the premise? Her presence in the first scene might lead the audience to believe that the play is all about her. Remember that your play is about being a man and being a husband, not being a parent.
4) In the TV scene and the birthday scene, which you tend to overdevelop by making everyone talk of trivialities, your story stops moving forward. Be aware that your genre is poetic realism, not realism.
5) Eliminate unnecessary subplots. Your focus is Agni-Malavika.
6) In a mystery play (not in the medieval sense), a playwright will always allow his audience to be ten steps ahead of the storyteller. No surprises should be sprung.
7) No matter what the subject matter, begin your play as close to the climax as possible.
Take a rest and mull over your play before rewriting it.
Diagram your trilogy on a piece of paper and write, under each play title, what you need to achieve in each play. You will find that the less characters you have, the more substantial your work will be.
You may not be able to rewrite this draft in time for my arrival in Singapore. However, I will be happy to meet you anyway, to discuss what difficulties you may be having.
Friday, June 15, 2018
Saturday, June 2, 2018
The ten Chinese hells await us in Haw Par Villa, where I am conducting two short workshops for beginners on top of the main workshop for TheatreWorks Singapore. I can't wait to see these, they remind me so much of scenes from my favorite Judge Dee books.
Haw Par Villa is the venue for Singapore's 2018 24-Hour Playwriting Competition.
Haw Par Villa is the venue for Singapore's 2018 24-Hour Playwriting Competition.
Premise: You begin a play with a protagonist in conflict with an antagonist over something BIG that is AT STAKE. The play ends with the protagonist not where he has always been but in a completely different position, as far away from his original position as possible. That is the ONLY meaning of dramatic change.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: "Home" by Ivan
Hello Ivan!
Interesting play--since it will have a niche audience, I see it being performed in a bar, a living room, or backstage of a theatre with an invitational audience seated at small tables and in chairs and having drinks and light snacks. There are no exits for the performers; they simply sit with the audience until their next cue, a la Grotowski. Everything can then be filmed at the same time with multiple cameras.
The play you have chosen to submit is not "drama" by the definition we discussed in the workshop, in the sense that nothing "big" is at stake. It is, however, an interesting vignette and commentary, although the subject matter is not something that has never been addressed before. Its success rests greatly on ingenious staging.
Proofread and polish your manuscript. Cast your friends as characters. Let us have a reading when we meet.
Interesting play--since it will have a niche audience, I see it being performed in a bar, a living room, or backstage of a theatre with an invitational audience seated at small tables and in chairs and having drinks and light snacks. There are no exits for the performers; they simply sit with the audience until their next cue, a la Grotowski. Everything can then be filmed at the same time with multiple cameras.
The play you have chosen to submit is not "drama" by the definition we discussed in the workshop, in the sense that nothing "big" is at stake. It is, however, an interesting vignette and commentary, although the subject matter is not something that has never been addressed before. Its success rests greatly on ingenious staging.
Proofread and polish your manuscript. Cast your friends as characters. Let us have a reading when we meet.
Friday, June 1, 2018
Singaporean Playwrights: Are you able to electronically resubmit your complete plays to me by June 15, 2018? If possible, in our next meeting, your manuscripts should be read, casting your friends as the characters, so that we become engaged with your plays as enunciated and as heard, and no longer as written.
Please pass to those who are not in my Friends and Followers Lists.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Two Halves Make a Whole_ by Danial
Hello Danial!
Very good work on your play. A question, though: Your manuscript title is Two Halves Make a Hole, but your file name is Two Halves Make a Whole. Which is which? (Both actually make sense to me.)
It's quite wonderful that you changed the protagonists' race to Malay from Chinese. It means, to me, that you have become emboldened to come closer to Truth. As I told everyone in the workshop, writing a play is an emotionally violent act on the self. Truth causes pain--but then again so does resistance to truth.
Your play is a wonderful example of a story being told purely through the spoken word. It is verbose but effective because of your adept handling of language. You are actually so good at it because of two things: 1) your dialogue creates excellent acting vehicles, and 2) the story is so clearly told through dialogue that it can be performed against only a backdrop of a solid color with no sets.
To answer the questions you posed to me in the middle of your manuscript:
--To an adolescent, examples of power symbols are cars, weapons such as guns and swords, implements of extreme sports, and the like.
--Broken power symbols, therefore, would be crashed cars, and dismantled or damaged weapons and implements of extreme sports.
--Power symbols change depending on the developmental stage one is in. To an older male, these would include bags of money, alcohol, seductive women, et cetera.
It is all right to add all of those scenes you are planning to write in, keeping in mind that every scene must be a clear demonstration of the premise. Do not worry about whether your play will be too long--the director will trim and cut where necessary.
Proofread your work. A lot of pronouns keep getting inserted in the wrong places because you may have misused the "Find and Replace" function.
The second slap in Act III, Scene 1 might elicit laughter from the audience.
Finish and polish your play now. As it is, it is almost reading-ready.
Very good work on your play. A question, though: Your manuscript title is Two Halves Make a Hole, but your file name is Two Halves Make a Whole. Which is which? (Both actually make sense to me.)
It's quite wonderful that you changed the protagonists' race to Malay from Chinese. It means, to me, that you have become emboldened to come closer to Truth. As I told everyone in the workshop, writing a play is an emotionally violent act on the self. Truth causes pain--but then again so does resistance to truth.
Your play is a wonderful example of a story being told purely through the spoken word. It is verbose but effective because of your adept handling of language. You are actually so good at it because of two things: 1) your dialogue creates excellent acting vehicles, and 2) the story is so clearly told through dialogue that it can be performed against only a backdrop of a solid color with no sets.
To answer the questions you posed to me in the middle of your manuscript:
--To an adolescent, examples of power symbols are cars, weapons such as guns and swords, implements of extreme sports, and the like.
--Broken power symbols, therefore, would be crashed cars, and dismantled or damaged weapons and implements of extreme sports.
--Power symbols change depending on the developmental stage one is in. To an older male, these would include bags of money, alcohol, seductive women, et cetera.
It is all right to add all of those scenes you are planning to write in, keeping in mind that every scene must be a clear demonstration of the premise. Do not worry about whether your play will be too long--the director will trim and cut where necessary.
Proofread your work. A lot of pronouns keep getting inserted in the wrong places because you may have misused the "Find and Replace" function.
The second slap in Act III, Scene 1 might elicit laughter from the audience.
Finish and polish your play now. As it is, it is almost reading-ready.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Folie a Trois_ by Sarah
Hello Sarah!
The most remarkable thing about your manuscript is that, although incomplete, it has all the elements that we discussed in our workshop: specifically a clear premise, the right point of attack, and conflict. Your dialogue is crisp and economical. The action is as swift as the action in the Gospel of Mark. The drama is unfolding properly. The play promises to be a wonderful case study of incest. Strangely, it is also Brechtian in treatment.
Please continue to work on and complete this play. Be sensitive to cultural references--for example, is the Wheel of Fortune game within the collective unconscious of Singaporeans, or is there a Chinese game of a similar nature that we can connect more comfortably not only with the protagonist but also with her father?
Like Rae, you have a good ear for dialogue, but give more texture to the other characters' speech (except for the father, whose dialogue is properly Singlese) to avoid making them sound like one another.
Your management of time is clever, but the changes should be made clearer to the audience.
On the whole, good work. Keep it going. I hope you can do more pages, if not the entire play, in time for my arrival in Singapore. Write at least two hours a day--whether on this manuscript or not. Just write.
When you re-submit your work, kindly highlight the passages you changed or added, in a bright color. If nothing is highlighted, I will assume that you did nothing to change the work.
The most remarkable thing about your manuscript is that, although incomplete, it has all the elements that we discussed in our workshop: specifically a clear premise, the right point of attack, and conflict. Your dialogue is crisp and economical. The action is as swift as the action in the Gospel of Mark. The drama is unfolding properly. The play promises to be a wonderful case study of incest. Strangely, it is also Brechtian in treatment.
Please continue to work on and complete this play. Be sensitive to cultural references--for example, is the Wheel of Fortune game within the collective unconscious of Singaporeans, or is there a Chinese game of a similar nature that we can connect more comfortably not only with the protagonist but also with her father?
Like Rae, you have a good ear for dialogue, but give more texture to the other characters' speech (except for the father, whose dialogue is properly Singlese) to avoid making them sound like one another.
Your management of time is clever, but the changes should be made clearer to the audience.
On the whole, good work. Keep it going. I hope you can do more pages, if not the entire play, in time for my arrival in Singapore. Write at least two hours a day--whether on this manuscript or not. Just write.
When you re-submit your work, kindly highlight the passages you changed or added, in a bright color. If nothing is highlighted, I will assume that you did nothing to change the work.
Thursday, May 31, 2018
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _The Fundamentalist Father_ by Helmi
Hello Helmi!
I remember the first few pages of your draft for this play, which you read to us in last year's workshop. This is a delightful addition to your last two plays, and they bring you to the fore as a social activist playwright commenting on current issues the way Oscar Wilde did in his Mannerist plays. Try to get this and the previous play on stage. If no producer will take them due to the controversial subject matter, stage them in houses with invitational audiences. You can then come up with definitive versions of the play and try to have them published in another country. Barring that, post them in cyberspace, where I have been publishing my works for more than ten years now.
We discussed the disadvantage of casting children, but I can see adults performing the role of the children in this play.
Scene 3 is cinematic and underwritten, but it will work because all it requires is a lighting change.
There is a passage of years after Scene 6 and after Scene 11. Try to make this more evident than by means of passing remarks and references.
Proofread your work. In many sentences you have missing verbs and prepositions.
Is the painting of portraits and landscapes acceptable to a fundamentalist Muslim? My understanding is that Islamic artists are allowed to paint abstractions and patterns only, but this could not be the case in your community.
Toward the end of the play the father becomes more a representation of bigotry rather than fundamentalism, and those two are not the same. You might want to rethink your title, which blatantly announces what the audience will expect, or change more of the issues being addressed in the play to religious ones.
I am looking forward to how you will decide to end this play. It is the premise, of course, that will tell you how.
When you resubmit your work, kindly highlight the passages you changed or added, in a bright color. If nothing is highlighted, I will assume that you did nothing to change the work.
I remember the first few pages of your draft for this play, which you read to us in last year's workshop. This is a delightful addition to your last two plays, and they bring you to the fore as a social activist playwright commenting on current issues the way Oscar Wilde did in his Mannerist plays. Try to get this and the previous play on stage. If no producer will take them due to the controversial subject matter, stage them in houses with invitational audiences. You can then come up with definitive versions of the play and try to have them published in another country. Barring that, post them in cyberspace, where I have been publishing my works for more than ten years now.
We discussed the disadvantage of casting children, but I can see adults performing the role of the children in this play.
Scene 3 is cinematic and underwritten, but it will work because all it requires is a lighting change.
There is a passage of years after Scene 6 and after Scene 11. Try to make this more evident than by means of passing remarks and references.
Proofread your work. In many sentences you have missing verbs and prepositions.
Is the painting of portraits and landscapes acceptable to a fundamentalist Muslim? My understanding is that Islamic artists are allowed to paint abstractions and patterns only, but this could not be the case in your community.
Toward the end of the play the father becomes more a representation of bigotry rather than fundamentalism, and those two are not the same. You might want to rethink your title, which blatantly announces what the audience will expect, or change more of the issues being addressed in the play to religious ones.
I am looking forward to how you will decide to end this play. It is the premise, of course, that will tell you how.
When you resubmit your work, kindly highlight the passages you changed or added, in a bright color. If nothing is highlighted, I will assume that you did nothing to change the work.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks Singapore: _Mixed_ by Rae
Hello Rae!
Your play requires a lot of reworking but, if you handle the material carefully and prodigiously, it will end up being stage-worthy. For starters it is about the juxtaposition of relationships, which is always of universal value, while addressing issues of racism and discrimination.
The real drama begins in Act 3, Scene 1, the penultimate scene in your play. This is the best point of attack. Something big is at stake, the audience immediately knows it, and the premise is loud and clear. Your choices are now between two directions: 1) proceed writing from this scene, which will entail developing new protagonists, and 2) use it as a springboard for a flashback.
Before proceeding with restructuring and revising, be aware that sexuality has always been problematic subject matter for all playwrights. There is only one playwright in this world who attempted several times to write about it--that was Tennessee Williams, and, even to this day, many drama professors look upon those works as immature.
Strive to give architectonic balance to the entire work. In every Act, therefore, it would be more sound to have the same number of scenes. Otherwise one or two Acts will end up lopsided.
On the whole, your play seems to have been written for the medium of television, employing close-ups and fades. Remember that, for that medium, many scenes are written for transition, for mood, and for entertainment. On the stage, every scene must push forward the premise and must therefore be complete.
Your ability to establish characters without lengthy exposition is one of your remarkable assets. You also have a good ear for dialogue, but avoid trite passages such as on Page 6, Line 3, where someone says, "We've got to stop meeting like this".
Are you able to redo your work in time for my arrival in Singapore?
When you re-submit your work, kindly highlight the passages you changed or added, in a bright color. If nothing is highlighted, I will assume that you did nothing to change the work.
I dramaturge works not only as stage plays but as dramatic literature, which it must be long after the curtain falls.
Your play requires a lot of reworking but, if you handle the material carefully and prodigiously, it will end up being stage-worthy. For starters it is about the juxtaposition of relationships, which is always of universal value, while addressing issues of racism and discrimination.
The real drama begins in Act 3, Scene 1, the penultimate scene in your play. This is the best point of attack. Something big is at stake, the audience immediately knows it, and the premise is loud and clear. Your choices are now between two directions: 1) proceed writing from this scene, which will entail developing new protagonists, and 2) use it as a springboard for a flashback.
Before proceeding with restructuring and revising, be aware that sexuality has always been problematic subject matter for all playwrights. There is only one playwright in this world who attempted several times to write about it--that was Tennessee Williams, and, even to this day, many drama professors look upon those works as immature.
Strive to give architectonic balance to the entire work. In every Act, therefore, it would be more sound to have the same number of scenes. Otherwise one or two Acts will end up lopsided.
On the whole, your play seems to have been written for the medium of television, employing close-ups and fades. Remember that, for that medium, many scenes are written for transition, for mood, and for entertainment. On the stage, every scene must push forward the premise and must therefore be complete.
Your ability to establish characters without lengthy exposition is one of your remarkable assets. You also have a good ear for dialogue, but avoid trite passages such as on Page 6, Line 3, where someone says, "We've got to stop meeting like this".
Are you able to redo your work in time for my arrival in Singapore?
When you re-submit your work, kindly highlight the passages you changed or added, in a bright color. If nothing is highlighted, I will assume that you did nothing to change the work.
I dramaturge works not only as stage plays but as dramatic literature, which it must be long after the curtain falls.
Tuesday, March 13, 2018
Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Sunday, February 4, 2018
Monday, January 29, 2018
Saturday, January 27, 2018
Tuesday, January 23, 2018
Tuesday, January 16, 2018
Thursday, January 11, 2018
Imagination is an unstructured mass of images, words, memories, associations, and feelings that need to be siphoned through consciousness in order to exist as a comprehensible work of art.
Sometimes it is comprised of concepts and ideas from extraterrestrial sources, which also need to be siphoned through consciousness.
Sometimes it is comprised of concepts and ideas from extraterrestrial sources, which also need to be siphoned through consciousness.
Monday, January 8, 2018
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks: _Make Sure_ by Clara
Hi Clara!
You worked very hard on rewriting this play. It is tighter; every scene pushes the premise forward; and the play ends in a delightful turnabout. Your strongest points are an ear for dialogue as spoken in the streets (as opposed to poetic dialogue) and a sense of humor, both of which I found absent in your other play, Birth Days.
Make Sure verges on theatre of the absurd. It is a comment on the tension between authority and the individual (or the individualist). The only suggestion I can make at this point is perhaps link each artwork in the gallery to a particular playwright or a play (as you did the first installation with Tennessee Williams's The Glass Menagerie. That would add a dimension to the parallelism you are drawing between theatre and visual art.
This play seems more reading-ready to me than your other play.
You worked very hard on rewriting this play. It is tighter; every scene pushes the premise forward; and the play ends in a delightful turnabout. Your strongest points are an ear for dialogue as spoken in the streets (as opposed to poetic dialogue) and a sense of humor, both of which I found absent in your other play, Birth Days.
Make Sure verges on theatre of the absurd. It is a comment on the tension between authority and the individual (or the individualist). The only suggestion I can make at this point is perhaps link each artwork in the gallery to a particular playwright or a play (as you did the first installation with Tennessee Williams's The Glass Menagerie. That would add a dimension to the parallelism you are drawing between theatre and visual art.
This play seems more reading-ready to me than your other play.
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks: _Birth Days_ by Clara
Hi Clara!
Again I enjoyed your handling of language. Your journalist's obsession-compulsion helped; your thorough proofreading and concern with the usage of correct idioms and spelling ensured good reading.
My comments on your manuscript remain the same as before. Since you did not make changes other than add more poetic imagery in the monologues, my dramaturging remains at a standstill.
This close to the staged reading of your play, try to consider the following:
--The overall style is poetic realism. The monologues are interspersed, however, with a melodrama. If you stripped off all the monologues that is what you merely end up with.
--The premise seems to have much to do with distrust, rather than love, or woman as co-creator and man as traitor. As such the play might be more appropriately titled Birthing Days rather than Birth Days.
--Act 2 Scene 3 onward comes across as an epilogue to the entire play. The character change of SABINE is abrupt, and the audience will feel deprived of everything that led to this change. Character change must be shown as coming from within, not as a result of a vehicular accident or of mellowing with age.
--On Page 39, the disembodied voice of the INTERVIEWER is quite out of syncopation with everything else. You've been showing all the minor characters onstage so far. Why not the INTERVIEWER?
--LENG and MICHAEL are not real characters because they do not undergo dramatic change, they are there simply as props for SABINE. The false closure you give them in the end are inexplicable.
As a general rule, when I dramaturge a play, I am unable to proceed if the playwright takes no action on my suggestions. It is pointless to keep resubmitting to me practically the same manuscript over and over again, hoping that I will see things differently.
I usually don't.
Again I enjoyed your handling of language. Your journalist's obsession-compulsion helped; your thorough proofreading and concern with the usage of correct idioms and spelling ensured good reading.
My comments on your manuscript remain the same as before. Since you did not make changes other than add more poetic imagery in the monologues, my dramaturging remains at a standstill.
This close to the staged reading of your play, try to consider the following:
--The overall style is poetic realism. The monologues are interspersed, however, with a melodrama. If you stripped off all the monologues that is what you merely end up with.
--The premise seems to have much to do with distrust, rather than love, or woman as co-creator and man as traitor. As such the play might be more appropriately titled Birthing Days rather than Birth Days.
--Act 2 Scene 3 onward comes across as an epilogue to the entire play. The character change of SABINE is abrupt, and the audience will feel deprived of everything that led to this change. Character change must be shown as coming from within, not as a result of a vehicular accident or of mellowing with age.
--On Page 39, the disembodied voice of the INTERVIEWER is quite out of syncopation with everything else. You've been showing all the minor characters onstage so far. Why not the INTERVIEWER?
--LENG and MICHAEL are not real characters because they do not undergo dramatic change, they are there simply as props for SABINE. The false closure you give them in the end are inexplicable.
As a general rule, when I dramaturge a play, I am unable to proceed if the playwright takes no action on my suggestions. It is pointless to keep resubmitting to me practically the same manuscript over and over again, hoping that I will see things differently.
I usually don't.
Saturday, January 6, 2018
Dramaturgy for TheatreWorks: _Waiting for Marimekko_, revised play for staged reading, by Pamela
Hello Pamela!
I enjoyed reading the polished version of your poignant play. There is only one comment I have on your manuscript, which is the stage direction on Page 7, Lines 11 - 12 ("SARAH sits on the bench, holding his right hand and leaning against him"). "Him" can refer either to RASUL or to TAXI UNCLE. Specify ALEX.
Although a playwright may feel that her manuscript is final, keep an open mind during the rehearsals. You will find that your dialogue will adjust to the speech rhythms of your performers, and that they will spontaneously change words, split or merge sentences, and even skip lines altogether. When they do that, analyze whether there is valuable truth in the changes that they make. You have the option of incorporating them in your work.
Your overall theatrical treatment is impressionistic:
1. The important action occurs before a scene and after a scene and is never shown to the audience.
2. What the characters DO NOT SAY is more significant than what they say that comprises the true drama.
3. There is no explicit closure given to any of the characters.
Your director needs to cast brilliant performers in order to make a staged reading (as opposed to a performance with costumes, blocking, lighting, and music) work. I wish you all the best of luck.
It was a pleasure having you in my workshop. I saw your wedding pictures--yet another act in your life, and I congratulate you on this new act in your life as a young Singaporean playwright.
I enjoyed reading the polished version of your poignant play. There is only one comment I have on your manuscript, which is the stage direction on Page 7, Lines 11 - 12 ("SARAH sits on the bench, holding his right hand and leaning against him"). "Him" can refer either to RASUL or to TAXI UNCLE. Specify ALEX.
Although a playwright may feel that her manuscript is final, keep an open mind during the rehearsals. You will find that your dialogue will adjust to the speech rhythms of your performers, and that they will spontaneously change words, split or merge sentences, and even skip lines altogether. When they do that, analyze whether there is valuable truth in the changes that they make. You have the option of incorporating them in your work.
Your overall theatrical treatment is impressionistic:
1. The important action occurs before a scene and after a scene and is never shown to the audience.
2. What the characters DO NOT SAY is more significant than what they say that comprises the true drama.
3. There is no explicit closure given to any of the characters.
Your director needs to cast brilliant performers in order to make a staged reading (as opposed to a performance with costumes, blocking, lighting, and music) work. I wish you all the best of luck.
It was a pleasure having you in my workshop. I saw your wedding pictures--yet another act in your life, and I congratulate you on this new act in your life as a young Singaporean playwright.
Saturday, December 30, 2017
The New Year's Happiness Raffle
In your foyer, place a bowl filled with rolled-up slips of paper containing personal messages and poems of your own composition, and ask each guest to draw one as they come in.
Thursday, December 28, 2017
Tuesday, December 26, 2017
A Writer's Year-End Exercise
If you are keeping a journal, reflect on your previous year, a month at a time, from January to your present situation. Write one important thing you learned each month, coming up with a list of 36 (or less). Which three things helped you the most to grow mentally, emotionally, and spiritually?
Draw a pyramid of squares (bottom row, five squares, middle row, four squares, top row, three squares) and arrange your 12 lessons accordingly with the three most important things you learned on top.
Then draw three blank squares to complete the pyramid. Write, inside those squares, what you hope to attain in 2018.
Draw a pyramid of squares (bottom row, five squares, middle row, four squares, top row, three squares) and arrange your 12 lessons accordingly with the three most important things you learned on top.
Then draw three blank squares to complete the pyramid. Write, inside those squares, what you hope to attain in 2018.
Monday, December 25, 2017
Saturday, December 23, 2017
Wednesday, December 6, 2017
Monday, December 4, 2017
In-Depth Writing Exercise #8: Merging With The Elements
This exercise sounds easier than it seems.
1. Should you happen to have four, small, translucent glass containers with lids:
--fill the first glass with potting soil (earth),
--the second with incense dust (air),
--the third with ashes (fire),
--the fourth with sand (water).
Should you have two more:
--fill the fifth glass with sawdust (wood),
--and the sixth with iron filings (metal/iron).
2. Place the bottles on your writing desk--the more decorative they look, of course, the better.
3. Do this exercise not at whim but whenever you seem to be stuck on a passage or a scene that you are writing.
4. Take the bottles one at a time, holding each bottle in your hands, merging with the element and then re-visualizing or mentally re-composing the passage or scene in your mind.
5. You will find that each element will "write" the scene or passage for you in a different and distinct way.
6. Go with the scene or passage that resonates within you most, like an inner bell, an inner chime, or an inner tuning fork.
7. Your choice may determine the dominant element in your particular piece of writing.
1. Should you happen to have four, small, translucent glass containers with lids:
--fill the first glass with potting soil (earth),
--the second with incense dust (air),
--the third with ashes (fire),
--the fourth with sand (water).
Should you have two more:
--fill the fifth glass with sawdust (wood),
--and the sixth with iron filings (metal/iron).
2. Place the bottles on your writing desk--the more decorative they look, of course, the better.
3. Do this exercise not at whim but whenever you seem to be stuck on a passage or a scene that you are writing.
4. Take the bottles one at a time, holding each bottle in your hands, merging with the element and then re-visualizing or mentally re-composing the passage or scene in your mind.
5. You will find that each element will "write" the scene or passage for you in a different and distinct way.
6. Go with the scene or passage that resonates within you most, like an inner bell, an inner chime, or an inner tuning fork.
7. Your choice may determine the dominant element in your particular piece of writing.
Saturday, December 2, 2017
Sunday, November 26, 2017
Saturday, November 4, 2017
Saturday, October 28, 2017
Monday, October 23, 2017
Sunday, October 22, 2017
Saturday, September 30, 2017
Do you expend all of your energy, spend the best part of your day, and set aside a lot of time to consult others while you are writing your piece--AND THEN sit back flabbergasted when another writer simply turns his wrist and produces a masterpiece?
That is because you are writing from another person's truth, not your own.
Write from your own truth. It is as unique as your set of fingerprints.
That is because you are writing from another person's truth, not your own.
Write from your own truth. It is as unique as your set of fingerprints.
Friday, September 29, 2017
Knowing language, its craft, and its nuances comprises 30% of the requirements for writing. Your powers of observation, capacity for reflection, insight, memory recall, and emotional truthfulness comprise 69%, while 1% goes to your enjoyment of using writing instruments, whether pen or paper or electronic media.
All of those combined constitute your talent.
A long as you have that, you need not copy other people's "styles". Your individual experience is your truth, and your truth is your writing.
All of those combined constitute your talent.
A long as you have that, you need not copy other people's "styles". Your individual experience is your truth, and your truth is your writing.
Thursday, September 28, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











